A world of knowledge explored

READING
ID: 7ZK3QB
File Data
CAT:Ecology
DATE:January 20, 2026
Metrics
WORDS:1,050
EST:6 MIN
Transmission_Start
January 20, 2026

Trees Share Sugar Through Fungal Threads

Target_Sector:Ecology

You've probably walked through a forest and admired the trees reaching skyward, competing for sunlight. But beneath your feet, something stranger is happening. Trees are sending chemical messages through an underground network, sharing food with their relatives, and warning neighbors about incoming threats. It's less "survival of the fittest" and more "Game of Thrones meets a neighborhood potluck."

The Wood-Wide Web

In 1997, Dr. Suzanne Simard published a paper in Nature that changed how we see forests. She discovered that trees don't stand alone. They're connected through a vast underground network of fungi.

These mycorrhizal fungi form partnerships with tree roots. The fungi attach to the hairlike tips of roots, creating thread-like filaments called hyphae. These filaments spread through the soil, linking tree after tree. Think of it as nature's internet—except it runs on sugar instead of electricity.

The arrangement works like this: Trees capture sunlight and convert it to sugar through photosynthesis. They pump about 30% of that sugar down to the fungi. In exchange, the fungi act as extensions of the root system, gathering water and nutrients like nitrogen and phosphorus from far beyond where roots can reach.

But the network does more than just trade resources. It carries messages.

Mother Trees and Their Nurseries

Not all trees are equal in the network. The biggest, oldest trees act as hubs—what Simard calls "Mother Trees." These ancient giants connect to hundreds of other trees, young and old.

Mother Trees do something remarkable: they feed their young. When saplings struggle in deep shade, unable to photosynthesize enough sugar to survive, Mother Trees pump liquid sugar to them through the fungal network. Up to 40% of the carbon in a young tree's fine roots can come from other trees.

German forester Peter Wohlleben documented an extreme case: a 400-500 year old beech stump, long since cut down, still alive and green with chlorophyll. The surrounding beeches had kept it alive for centuries, sharing their sugar through the network. It's the botanical equivalent of a village caring for an elder who can no longer work.

Even in death, trees give. Dying trees dump their remaining resources into the network before they go—a last will and testament that neighboring trees inherit.

Chemical Warfare and Warning Systems

Cooperation doesn't mean forests are peaceful communes. Trees also compete, and they use chemistry to do it.

Some trees release allelopathic chemicals—substances that inhibit the growth of competitors. These allelochemicals leak from leaves, ooze from roots, wash down stems, and seep from decomposing plant matter. The main culprits are terpenes, phenolics, alkaloids, and nitriles.

Volatile terpenes are particularly nasty. They can bind with soil particles to form crusts that prevent seeds from germinating. It's chemical scorched-earth tactics.

Trees release most of these competitive chemicals through root exudates—substances that healthy roots constantly secrete into the soil. Young, non-woody roots produce the highest concentrations. Specific compounds like (-)-loliolide and jasmonic acid help trees detect and respond to neighbors.

But here's where it gets interesting: trees also use chemicals to help each other.

The Forest Alert System

When a tree gets attacked by insects or infected by disease, it doesn't suffer in silence. It sends warning signals through the mycorrhizal network.

Neighboring trees receive these chemical distress calls and respond by ramping up production of defensive compounds. Their defense enzymes get "up-regulated" before the threat even arrives. It's like a biological early warning system.

The signals work across species. When Douglas fir trees get injured, they dump carbon into the network and send defense signals to neighboring ponderosa pine seedlings. The pines aren't even the same species, but they get the message and prepare their defenses.

This challenges the traditional view of forests as battlegrounds where every tree fights alone. Instead, forests function more like communities with shared security systems.

Playing Favorites

Trees can be surprisingly nepotistic. Douglas fir trees recognize their own offspring and treat them better than strangers.

In experiments, Simard found that Mother Trees send more carbon to genetically related seedlings than to unrelated ones. They can somehow distinguish kin from non-kin through the network. The mechanism isn't fully understood, but it might involve chemical signatures in root exudates.

This kin recognition suggests trees have a primitive form of social behavior. They invest more in their relatives, increasing the chances their genes survive.

But trees also cooperate with completely different species. Paper birch and Douglas fir exchange carbon bidirectionally depending on the season. In summer, when firs grow in shade, birches send them carbon. In fall, when birches lose their leaves, firs return the favor.

This seasonal give-and-take suggests the network creates interdependence between species. Mixed forests may be more resilient than single-species plantations precisely because of these cooperative relationships.

What This Means for Forests

Understanding tree communication networks has practical implications for forestry and conservation.

Clear-cutting damages or destroys mycorrhizal networks. When you remove all the trees at once, you don't just harvest timber—you tear apart the underground infrastructure that helps forests recover. Seedlings planted in clear-cuts must rebuild the network from scratch, which slows regeneration.

Simard established The Mother Tree Project in 2015 to study regenerative forestry practices. The project explores how to harvest timber while preserving Mother Trees and the mycorrhizal networks they anchor.

The research also connects with Indigenous knowledge. Many Indigenous communities have long understood forests as interconnected systems rather than collections of individual trees. Indigenous territories contain about 80% of global biodiversity, and the Mother Tree Project works to bridge ancestral wisdom with modern science.

The Chemistry We're Still Discovering

Scientists have identified some of the chemicals trees exchange—sugars, nitrogen compounds, phosphorus, water, defense signals—but the full vocabulary remains unknown.

Recent research suggests the network might carry more complex information than previously thought. Some scientists propose trees might communicate about environmental conditions, coordinate fruiting seasons, or even share information about soil quality.

The field is young. Simard's groundbreaking paper came out less than 30 years ago. We're still learning the grammar of this underground chemical language.

What's clear is that forests are far more sophisticated than they appear. Beneath the visible competition for light, an invisible cooperation shapes who lives, who thrives, and who gets help in hard times. Trees aren't just standing timber. They're participants in chemical conversations we're only beginning to understand.

Distribution Protocols